Legislature(2005 - 2006)

2005-04-21 House Journal

Full Journal pdf

2005-04-21                     House Journal                      Page 1198
HB 169                                                                                            
The following, which was advanced to third reading from the April 20,                               
2005, calendar (page 1168), was read the third time:                                                
                                                                                                    
    CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 169(FIN)                                                                  
    "An Act relating to the educational requirements for certain real                               
    estate brokers, associate brokers, and salespersons with new or                                 
    suspended licenses; relating to review of real estate transactions                              
    by attorneys or associate brokers; relating to the requirements for                             
    a real estate broker license and an associate real estate broker                                
    license; and providing for an effective date."                                                  
                                                                                                    
Representatives Lynn and Rokeberg moved and asked unanimous                                         
consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting because of a                                    
conflict of interest.  Objection was heard, and the members were                                    
required to vote.                                                                                   
                                                                                                    
The question being:  "Shall CSHB 169(FIN) pass the House?"  The                                     
roll was taken with the following result:                                                           
                                                                                                    
CSHB 169(FIN)                                                                                       
Third Reading                                                                                       
Final Passage                                                                                       
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  36   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  3   ABSENT:  1                                                   
                                                                                                    

2005-04-21                     House Journal                      Page 1199
Yeas:  Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford,                                    
Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg,                                         
Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula, Kohring,                                
Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Ramras,                                          
Rokeberg, Salmon, Samuels, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson                                       
                                                                                                    
Excused:  Gatto, Joule, Seaton                                                                      
                                                                                                    
Absent:  Meyer                                                                                      
                                                                                                    
And so, CSHB 169(FIN) passed the House.                                                             
                                                                                                    
Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                   
roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the                             
effective date clause.  There being no objection, it was so ordered.                                
                                                                                                    
CSHB 169(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.